
Our last blog article, before this one, went live on 17 September. I know the date exactly, because my calendar has reminded me of it every Thursday since.
The reason why it’s been so long is pretty simple: we've been busy. Client work always comes first here, and there's been plenty of it. So our blog did what blogs at small companies often do. It slid down the to-do list, and then off the bottom.
I'll also admit something most studios probably wouldn't put on their own website. I don't love writing these. I'm a designer. Give me a grid, a type system and a tricky brief and I'm happy for hours. Give me a blank document and a word count, and I suddenly feel a strong urge to tidy my desktop. Ralu writes better and faster than I do, but she has even less time.
So instead of feeling guilty for another month, I decided to write about the question behind the guilt. We suspect plenty of founders, partners and marketing managers ask it too: is a company blog worth the time, and how often do you need to publish?
We have a decent basis for an answer. From January to September we published an article almost every single week, more than 30 in total. Then we sat down with the data and had an honest look.
For a small, expert-led company, a blog is worth it, but for a different reason than most marketing advice suggests. It's unlikely to bring a steady stream of strangers in from Google, because the people who hire you are too few and too specific to create much search traffic. What a blog does well is reassure people who are already considering you, give you something better to send than a long email, and give AI search tools a specific answer they can quote. For that job, one good article a month is enough. Publishing more often only helps if every piece still answers a real question your clients ask.
We learned more about who reads what than we gained in visitors. Four things stood out.
We don't regret the eight months. We now have over 40 articles that show how we think, which often does more in a sales conversation than a credentials slide. But it did change what we expect the blog to do.
Because the people who hire you are a small group, and most of them aren't searching for you in the first place. Your writing has very little to do with it; this is simply how expert services get bought.

A blog is proof of what you know, written down before anyone asks for it. For a small team, it does four useful jobs.
If writing about your own expertise feels a bit like showing off, you're in good company. We wrote about that in personal branding for leaders who hate self-promotion.

Once a month is enough for most specialist businesses, as long as you can keep it up in your busiest month.
Weekly publishing is the standard advice, and it suits businesses that live on search traffic. For a team that wins work through reputation, the price is steep. A good article takes us almost a full day from idea to publication, including research, writing, visuals and a second pair of eyes. Every week, that's a serious slice for a two-person studio. So we now publish every two to four weeks, a pace we can keep even when we’re busy. That’s the plan, anyway.
If you’re working out your own pace, here’s what we’d suggest:
An article is worth writing when it answers a specific question your clients ask and adds one thing the other answers leave out. Since we started publishing less, we run every idea past four questions first.
If an idea passes all four, it’s worth a day of your time. If it doesn’t, it’s probably a to-do list item pretending to be content, which is the trap we described in stop treating content marketing as a to-do list.

Yes, if your articles are specific. AI tools answer general questions themselves, but they still need sources for precise ones, and they quote the articles that give a clear, checkable answer.
Long enough to answer the question properly and no longer. Ours usually run between 1,500 and 2,000 words. Past that point, most readers start skimming.
You can outsource the writing, but not the knowledge. A ghostwriter working from an hour's interview with you will produce something useful. A generic content service working from a keyword list will produce the same article everyone else already has.
AI can help with structure, research and checking. The parts that make an article worth reading, your examples, your numbers and your opinions, have to come from you. Without them it reads like everyone else's.
Not by visitor numbers. Look at whether prospects mention an article, whether AI tools cite you, whether people forward your pieces to colleagues, and whether you find yourself sending links in client conversations.
Whatever you decide about your blog, the people who hear your name will look you up first. If your brand doesn't yet show them who you are today, here's how to talk to us.
Not ready for that? Say hello to Hans or Ralu on LinkedIn, where we write about the same things in shorter form. (Possibly less often than we'd like, but we're working on it.)