
You create a clean PowerPoint template.
Clear hierarchy. Defined font sizes. Everything aligned.
Three months later:
Someone resized the title because “it didn’t fit”.
Someone manually bolded half a paragraph “to make it stand out”.
Someone used Calibri because “the brand font didn’t load”.
It still looks fine (sometimes).
But now the slide deck doesn’t quite match the annual report.
The report doesn’t quite match the website.
And the LinkedIn visuals feel like they belong to yet another version of the brand.
No one broke the brand. No one ignored the guidelines.
But small typography decisions were never defined across platforms.
That’s how inconsistency creeps in.
Typography isn’t often the headline issue.
But more often than you might think, it’s the reason content stops feeling aligned.
In this article, I’m not talking about picking better fonts.
I’m talking about defining them properly, so they behave the same way whenever someone from your team creates content.
A typography style guide is not simply a list of fonts.
It’s a set of decisions that answers questions like:
If those decisions aren’t made, your team will solve them on the fly.
And they will solve them slightly differently every time.
That’s how small inconsistencies start.
A good typography style guide prevents that.It doesn’t have to be long. But it does have to be specific.
Most typography guides start with “choose two fonts”.
Ok, sounds easy.
But what happens when your custom brand font isn’t available?
Because at some point, someone will open your Microsoft Word template on a laptop that doesn’t have it installed.
Or export a PowerPoint without embedding fonts.
Or recreate a visual in Canva.
If your typography guide only says:
Primary font: X
Secondary font: Y
You haven’t defined them enough.
You need to define the full stack.
That means:
Website font
What’s used online and how it’s loaded.
Microsoft Word fallback
If your primary font isn’t available, what’s the approved alternative?
Not “whatever looks close”. One specific fallback font.
Microsoft PowerPoint mapping
Which font is set for titles? Which for body text?
Are you using the same weights as online, or simplified ones?
Design tools compatibility
Is your primary font available there?
If not, what’s the closest approved equivalent?
If you don’t define this, people will choose what’s easiest at that moment.
And that’s how Calibri sneaks in (no offense).
This doesn’t mean lowering your standards, but to accept that your brand doesn’t live in one controlled environment. It lives in documents, decks, editable templates, and social visuals.
Define the default once, make the fallback clear and make sure it’s written down so people can refer to that document every time they have an issue.

Choosing fonts is step one.
Defining how they’re used is where consistency happens.
Hierarchy answers questions like:
If this isn’t defined, people improvise.
Usually by making things bigger, bolder, louder.
You don’t need a complex type scale, but you do need consistent relationships.
For example:
Body text: 11pt in Word
Heading 1: 18pt
Heading 2: 14pt
Caption: 9pt
The exact numbers matter less than the logic behind them.
If your website body text is 18px and your report body text is 11pt, that’s fine.
But the visual contrast between levels should feel similar.
Decide things like:
Also define what not to do.
Are headings in sentence case or title case?
“Annual sustainability report 2026”
or
“Annual Sustainability Report 2026”
Pick one.
Also define how headings wrap.Avoid awkward one-word second lines when possible.Balance line breaks intentionally in reports and visuals.

Fonts and sizes get most of the attention.
Spacing is what makes text readable.
And in editable documents, spacing is where chaos often starts to appear.
If it’s not defined, people press Enter twice.
Or adjust spacing randomly until it “looks right”, which can mean different things to different people.
Start with a default.
For example:
Body text: 11pt
Line spacing: 1.2 or 1.5
You don’t need to lock it down rigidly.
But define the default so adjustments are intentional, not accidental.
This is one of the biggest overlooked details.
Decide:
Lists are common in reports and decks.
So define:
These details seem small, but across dozens of pages they influence how polished your content feels.
Associations love tables. And footnotes.
Without these rules, tables become cramped and footnotes become unreadable.
If your organisation works in more than one language, typography can get more complex very quickly.
English might fit perfectly.
German suddenly makes headings longer.
French adds accents and line breaks in different places.
Make sure your font supports all the languages you publish in.
That includes:
Some languages expand. Others shrink.
Accessibility isn’t just legal, it’s also practical.
Things like:
Light grey text might look elegant on screen, but disappear when printed or projected.
Ultra-light weights may work on a retina display. They don’t work in meeting rooms.
So define:

You can define beautiful typography rules but if your documents are editable, those rules need to survive handover. Something we also wrote about in this article.
In Word and PowerPoint, formatting should live in styles.
That means:
Not:
You’ve probably seen this:
The heading doesn’t fit on one line.
So someone reduces the font size slightly. Or adds a manual line break, or stretches the text box.
It works in that one document.
But now that file behaves differently from the template.
Define:
These small guardrails protect consistency.
Especially in PowerPoint and PDFs.
If fonts aren’t embedded:
Your typography guide should include:
Editable documents will never be as controlled as a designed PDF. That’s fine. The goal isn’t perfection but rather predictability.
Define what must stay consistent and allow flexibility where it makes sense.
Typography shouldn’t break just because someone edited a sentence.
If you strip everything back, your typography style guide should answer these questions clearly and unambiguously.
It doesn’t have to be a 40-page document, but it should remove doubt.
Because every time someone asks, “What size should this be?” or “Can I just make this bold?”, that's a decision your style guide should have already answered.
If you’ve read this and realised your typography decisions aren’t fully defined, that’s normal. Most teams don’t define them until something breaks. If you’d like help turning this into a working system across your templates and platforms, have a look at how we work or get in touch.